极速赛车168最新开奖号码 Comments on: An update on the Mental Health Bill’s passage through Parliament

极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Mr Antonio Almanzar

Mr Antonio Almanzar — Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:40:54 +0000

This bill must include making forced ECT to anyone a Illegal practice like in Germany, Italy, Hungary, Belgium, Switzerland Etc.. ECT caused my daughter a dangerous blood clot with swollen red feet and massive cognitive problems. The official Lampard Inquiry is evidence of more than 3,000 premature violent deaths inside the psychiatric field over the last nie years. MPs must take this very seriously. Wider information in this industry is mentioned here: http://www.cchr.org.

极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Ziggy D

Ziggy D — Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:06:35 +0000

In reply to Alex123.

Disagree regarding 117 draining council resources. The LA is able to get NHS covering partial cost under S117 (including anyone in a care home/specialist placement long term due to their MH, which I would argue is the most costly of the 117 aftercare plans). If these people had to come off of this after 6 months, council would just have to pick up the full cost, or face moving the person and disrupting their MH again.

Time limiting 117 would also defeat the purpose of ensuring services are in place to prevent relapse and hospital re admission. Why would people not need these services long term? As soon as a person had to pay the council for a council funded care package, engage in a finance assessment, tons of mentally unwell people would cease engaging and relapse, back to hospital.

I suspect the 117 deal saves the NHS quite a bit long term compared to re admissions and bed blocking. And saves the LA’s money in placement costs that they would have needed to end up funding anyway.

极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Yolande

Yolande — Tue, 18 Mar 2025 06:31:42 +0000

In reply to Alex123. My son has be on a CTO for 10 years, I need help to sort out this issue, but unfortunately my hands are tight, now he back in hospital,

极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Alex123

Alex123 — Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:38:12 +0000

117 aftercare should have a clear time period of 3-6 months . Sole purpose of aftercare is to prevent further re admission and more often this provision is misused and often drain council resources rather unnecessarily.

Another area where the misuse happens is CTO, it is right that criteria is tightened .

Furthermore, drug and alcohol , Autism and LD service users should be treated with better alternatives than MHA,