极速赛车168最新开奖号码 Comments on: Social Worker of the Year Awards open for entries https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2023/04/03/social-worker-of-the-year-awards-open-for-entries-3/ Social Work News & Social Care Jobs Thu, 06 Apr 2023 14:19:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 Social Worker of the Year Awards 2022, overall winners, pictured at parliamentary reception 极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Simon Cardy https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2023/04/03/social-worker-of-the-year-awards-open-for-entries-3/#comment-314234 Thu, 06 Apr 2023 14:19:44 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=197375#comment-314234 All is not what it seems as Christian accurately sets out above. Frontline have set out to ‘contest’ local authority and HEIs based on ‘disruption theory’ suppressing and holding back more than capable social workers and leaders to develop social work for itself draining resources. Yes it’s ideas and social work approaches have some merit but now’s the time to integrate these into social work and wind down Frontline rather than help them expand their growing influence and who continually like to put themselves on a pedestal. Frontline do nothing to contribute to the retention crisis or help share the limited funds for student bursaries frozen at £3k since 2014. And now rather than join in with the existing social work awards already in place, stripped largely of its corporate sponsors such as G4S. Frontline have now set up rival award system designed to promote themselves. Social work needs to wake up to the fact that Frontline is a cuckoo organisation funded by a politically corrupt government and shadowy philanthropy. Social work and social workers have a choice as to whether it want to allow the Cuckoo into the nest or stand on its own two feet?

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Christian Kerr https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2023/04/03/social-worker-of-the-year-awards-open-for-entries-3/#comment-314225 Thu, 06 Apr 2023 07:40:18 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=197375#comment-314225 The poll accompanying this piece doesn’t capture the breadth and complexity of the issues surrounding these awards. The awards in their current corporate/industry awards iteration play in the privatisation and commodification of social work and social support. The proximity of one of the largest and growing social work recruitment agencies, Sanctuary Personnel, via its decade-long sponsorship of the Awards, is uncomfortable and raises questions about who really benefits (see: https://link.medium.com/pPljl21SLyb). BASW’s continued support, despite the majority of nembers calling for an end to the association’s involvement at the 2021 AGM, in light of these things is problematic.

And now we have the Boston Consulting Group-founded and backed social work training scheme, Frontline, mounting what can only be construed as a rival awards scheme, clearly designed to promoting its own brand – and those of its corporate-philanthropic backers within the sector, a quite cynical move. (Interesting that the Social Work Awards have this year introduced an award for University Lecturers…)

Many will argue that there should be no problem with celebrating a misunderstood and maligned profession. It is hard to argue against something which is framed so positively, and critics are often cast as cynical naysayers. But any such celebration must surely avoid promoting the brands and interests of organisations that work counter to the interests of social workers and the people they hope and aim to support (see: https://link.medium.com/G0OMYKcTLyb). The entry of Frontline – backed by BCG which supports the Saudi regime and has been implicated in the alleged illegal aquisition of Angolan state assets, not to mention the scandal-prone Credit Suisse – into the awards arena further underscores the compromised position such corporately backed awards put our profession in. How. can we credibly advocate for a fairer society while allowing ourselves to be used to launder the images and reputations of organisations engaged in morally and ethically questionable activities that harm the interests of people in vulnerable and marginalised situations via such celebrations of social work?

It doesn’t have to be like this. Such celebrations should reflect the values, principles and missions of the profession, and certainly not serve the interests of private wealth.

]]>