极速赛车168最新开奖号码 Comments on: Government to revive CQC ratings of council adults’ services after more than decade-long gap https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2021/02/15/government-reintroduce-cqc-assessments-council-adults-services-following-decade-long-gap/ Social Work News & Social Care Jobs Sun, 12 Feb 2023 13:32:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 Image of computer key marked 'assessment' (Credit: momius / Adobe Stock) 极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Nigel https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2021/02/15/government-reintroduce-cqc-assessments-council-adults-services-following-decade-long-gap/#comment-264415 Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:21:15 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=183404#comment-264415 Inspection, scrutiny and legal oversight of adult services is welcome. I am not sure however that CQC has the independence or the will to hold private providers to account given its track record over mental health and learning disabilities services.

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Chris Sterry https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2021/02/15/government-reintroduce-cqc-assessments-council-adults-services-following-decade-long-gap/#comment-264252 Sun, 21 Feb 2021 11:01:30 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=183404#comment-264252 Worrying times for many reasons, lack of sufficient finance, but that is nothing new, Government interventions and again nothing new.

I agree with jan, fix the system first, for the system has to be flexible to meet all needs, while currently it is far from it. persons with needs have to fit the system, while it should be the system fitting the person. All persons are individuals with having many interwoven factors, so what is perhaps correct for one, may not be for another who appears to be displaying similar needs.

Social care has never been sufficiently funded and 10 years of austerity cuts by Conservative Governments has caused untold damage and then we have the costs related to COVID. Here the Government promised to cover these costs, but to date the funding supplied is falling way short, causing cash strapped councils even more funding problems.

Social care like health care is not cheap and it should not be run on a ‘shoestring’, for to not provide sufficient social care is storing more problems to be catered for under health, like it or not health and social care are instinkingly interwoven.

So, get the funding correct and then work to get the system fixed.

More powers are to be given to the CQC, but again they are kept short of funding and getting good and consistent good quality costs, so, for them to get anywhere near to monitoring quality then they also need to be sufficiently funded.

Neither social care, health care or checking on quality should be used as a ‘political football’ in that funding is given, restricted, etc on the whims of Governments. Within that funding staff care has also to be a priority, for there is much clamour for sufficient wages for health staff, do you notice it is always referenced to nurses and doctors, when there are a multitude of others within health and none can work without the others, for it is as a team that health is provided. An unclean area, will be detrimental to health carer no matter how good the nurses and doctors are.

This is the same in social care, where pay is abysmal, especially to those who deliver direct care, care work is a skilled employment for it is not just preparing meals, toileting, personal hygiene,etc, for while important, it has to be done in conjunction with emotional care, financial care, safeguarding, and many others, which are far from easy to place a monetary cost on for time is the main factor. Short calls 2 or 3 times per day are not the answer, for these do not allow sufficient time for the recognised care, toileting, dressing, meal preparation, etc, so no time for the other aspects.

So funding is way short even for the recognised care, let alone a pay rate for care workers to recognise the skills they should have and this all adds to quality of care, less time and money reduces quality, no matter how good the care workers are.

This Government has throughout COVID spent money here and there without looking to see if they have the funding to do so, but, in reality, no funding for social care. It is as though this and previous Governments do not see the ne4ed for social care and this needs to change, for if it does not the outlook for social care is not good.

Many are looking to the new White Paper, Integration and innovation: working together to improve health and social care for all, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-improve-health-and-social-care-for-all/integration-and-innovation-working-together-to-improve-health-and-social-care-for-all-html-version, as a possible saviour, but that has to be seen. On face value, it appears to have some good points, but within are some that are not so good. The reduction from 135 CCGs to 42 ICSs could well be not a good point, that is not that the existing CCGs were good, for they did have their faults,as to how many, that depended on who you were asking.

So, the White Paper needs to be looked at very carefully.

Will Social Care survive, now that is the question?

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Malcolm https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2021/02/15/government-reintroduce-cqc-assessments-council-adults-services-following-decade-long-gap/#comment-264212 Fri, 19 Feb 2021 22:47:37 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=183404#comment-264212 The reintroduction of inspections for Adult Services should be welcomed by all staff – no hiding behind budgets / local ‘interpretations’ of the Care Act and less focus on Children’s services because they ‘have to’ pass Ofsted inspections. They also need to legislate that all DAS posts must be a qualified SW so they at least are professionally responsible for their actions.

The removal of the CCGs is a good thing – they never worked properly, but unfortunately it will inevitably lead to a merry go round of senior health staff. A decade ago health staff took redundancy payments on a Friday and joined the new organisations on the Monday ………

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Berni https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2021/02/15/government-reintroduce-cqc-assessments-council-adults-services-following-decade-long-gap/#comment-264200 Fri, 19 Feb 2021 15:05:33 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=183404#comment-264200 What a mess , could we at least sort out the problems we have before creating new problems .

In the brief few years I have been doing this great job I have seen NHS reorganisation a new social care Act , CCG s getting prominence and by the back door privatisation of health services .

I have also seen a massive reduction in all staff and all services no matter the area and yes in the North we have taken a kicking since the cons ( intentional mis spell ) have been back in .

Go anywhere in adult social care and ask the people on the ground how it is just make sure you have a drink and something to eat because the work force does not stop and works as hard as anyone .

Why does the government not love the social care sector , I do what a great hard working bunch of people .

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Harvey Campbell https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2021/02/15/government-reintroduce-cqc-assessments-council-adults-services-following-decade-long-gap/#comment-264151 Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:23:24 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=183404#comment-264151 In reply to Monoca.

Tend to agree, doubt if the the inspection framework will be set against a financial back drop of 50% plus cut in local government fund in the past 10 years?

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Monoca https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2021/02/15/government-reintroduce-cqc-assessments-council-adults-services-following-decade-long-gap/#comment-264108 Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:08:21 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=183404#comment-264108 Oh the horse has bolted, hurry close the gate.

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Jan Parkin https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2021/02/15/government-reintroduce-cqc-assessments-council-adults-services-following-decade-long-gap/#comment-264107 Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:13:03 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=183404#comment-264107 And miraculously those comparatively ‘rich’ Tory-led Boroughs will do magnificently, while cash-starved Councils in areas of high need will struggle to meet the test. And divert precious resources towards trying to look good. Been there – experienced that awful feeling of getting beaten twice. Once for not being able to do my job because the funding isn’t there – and again because the scores tell us we must do better. Another way to kick northern Councils. I am passionate about quality and holding services to account – but the playing field is not level, and the motive is not about quality or people. Fix the system first – then see how well we perform.

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Mark https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2021/02/15/government-reintroduce-cqc-assessments-council-adults-services-following-decade-long-gap/#comment-264088 Mon, 15 Feb 2021 15:34:04 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=183404#comment-264088 This is fantastic news. I worked in Children’s Services for a long time and then found it completely bizarre when I moved to Adult Social Care that there was no external oversight or inspection. Whilst I see some very good practice, equally I see some really worrying practice. I hope there is an emphasis upon needs assessments and assessments of capacity and best interests decision making. This would give managers the impetus they need to properly scrutinise these documents and ensure that their own audits are in line with the law and professional regulation, and to take proper action to improve practice. At the moment because there is no external oversight, practitioners and managers know that the only time their practice will ever be scrutinised is if something goes wrong, so many cut corners and interpret the law to suit their own needs. I know, I’ve seen it over many years and it needs to stop. Regulation of adult social care services by the CQC is long overdue and it will only benefit service users and help to improve practice!

]]>