极速赛车168最新开奖号码 Comments on: Sector split on unregulated placements overhaul as under-16s ban looms

极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Judicial review of unregulated placements legislation granted – Communitycare.co.uk – Abayuuti

Fri, 20 Aug 2021 05:46:52 +0000

[…] 39, which has brought the legal challenge, is one of a number of organisations to have argued that the controversial move leaves 16- and 17-year-olds, who account for most unregulated placements, exposed to harm.The […]

极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Robin Sen

Robin Sen — Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:45:05 +0000

I’m an active BASW member and it is worth emphasising that the express position of BASW is to support the extension of regulated care in England to all children and young people in state care up to the age of 18. In the BASW membership consultation on this of 2020, individual BASW members fed back on their views of the negatives and positives about the government’s proposals to regulate accommodation for children in care only for those aged below 16. There were a variety of views and some of the individual views raising questions about the impact of regulation on the currently unregulated accommodation sector are quoted in this article. However, it is important to note these were individual members’ views and were not representative of the BASW membership as a whole. Indeed, the same BASW consulation response document does specifically note that other BASW members in the consultation did voice different views to the ones which have been cited in this article e.g. it says near the start of this consultation response that:
” It is worth noting, however, that some members felt that limiting this ban to under 16 years fails
to fully understand and implement the rights of all children. One member pointed out that “The
UNCRC, that the UK government has signed, clearly states the age of majority is until 18.” “

极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Tom J

Tom J — Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:02:22 +0000

I’d love more detail on how this will work in practice.

For example; if a child under sixteen needs a placement next month and the only available one within a 200 mile radius is unregulated, does that mean that I as the social worker will put them in a regulated one 400 miles away? If the answer is yes; what about their school? Friends?

I ask the above question as the new rule as not been followed by lots of new regulated placements.

Anyone know the answer?