极速赛车168最新开奖号码 Comments on: Government to create new type of accommodation for children at risk of deprivation of liberty https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2024/11/20/government-to-create-new-type-of-accommodation-for-children-at-risk-of-deprivation-of-liberty/ Social Work News & Social Care Jobs Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:16:21 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 teenager lying with hand on forehead 600 极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Shaj Zuu https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2024/11/20/government-to-create-new-type-of-accommodation-for-children-at-risk-of-deprivation-of-liberty/#comment-358679 Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:27:13 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=213482#comment-358679 I completely agree that we need to shut down all unregulated provisions. They only provide some sort of monitoring. They lack care and support.

One of the biggest hurdle genuine people/companies face is the planning from the Local Authority. This also needs to the looked at. If planning is granted to support the local children to stay in the local area with/without DOLs then all providers would register.

I, someone with 18 years of experience working with children in care tried twice before to get planning but have been rejected or discouraged as LA don’t want to do change of use, but see a lot of people with zero experience get planning very easily.

For DOLS placement to be registered with Ofsted, would require planning from LA.
How would this be navigated?

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Donatella https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2024/11/20/government-to-create-new-type-of-accommodation-for-children-at-risk-of-deprivation-of-liberty/#comment-358316 Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:28:55 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=213482#comment-358316 In reply to Donna.

Why were your children removed Donna?

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Donna https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2024/11/20/government-to-create-new-type-of-accommodation-for-children-at-risk-of-deprivation-of-liberty/#comment-357897 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:46:09 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=213482#comment-357897 In reply to Pauline O’Reggio.

I think as a mum all orders needs to be looked at propley and the mums who are single parents should be giving the help with there children at home with a support worker calling in for three months to see if they are coping well and if they see they are the case then should be shut not till they have seen the children and mums and family’s at home first and some mums don’t get the change to show this as some social workers don’t wanna work with family’s and please look in to this right away but always give mums and family a chance first

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Brian Durham https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2024/11/20/government-to-create-new-type-of-accommodation-for-children-at-risk-of-deprivation-of-liberty/#comment-357826 Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:01:13 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=213482#comment-357826 When I first worked in children’s homes in the 1980s, we were allowed to stand in front of a a door to prevent an upset child from leaving. If necessary to apply a restraint for the minimum time, using only minimum pressure, and using only a recognised technique for which we had been trained. That changed at some point and by then I’d retrained as a Social Worker, and saw an increasing number of homes refusing to intervene that way.
I’m at the end of my career and I see children in unregulated solo placements run by cowboy companies charging huge sums, because the child/ young person presents a threat of harm to others or themselves while we wait for a DoLS Hearing.
A properly managed children’s home with high staffing ratios and properly trained staff should be able to do a better job, if they were not fearful.
An increased frequency of Ofsted inspections would be an important safeguard too.

]]>
极速赛车168最新开奖号码 By: Pauline O'Reggio https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2024/11/20/government-to-create-new-type-of-accommodation-for-children-at-risk-of-deprivation-of-liberty/#comment-357705 Wed, 20 Nov 2024 22:41:44 +0000 https://www.communitycare.co.uk/?p=213482#comment-357705 This proposel may support those children who are placed in inapproprate placements which do not meet thier individual needs.Often children and young people are experincing trauma,mental health issues,continual absconding where by they remain at risk.The responce of the home is to request removal.(not helpful for the child or social worker who then can not complete appropriate assessments to identify the child’s needs and or access approprate services).

Sorry to say in my opinion the current provisions does not meet the young persons indiviaul needs and offer no therapeutic work.Although on the surface the young person may appear to require a secure environment application for a deprivation of liberty order may not always be in the best interest of the child.They may not have experienced the benefits/opportunity of a therapeutic
placement where by meaningful indivual planning has been identified.

Requesting a deprivation of liberty order is not a decision taken lightly.

Placements need to be offering meaningful work and not just accommodation or an ipod if not it serves no purpose for the child/young person. When children are removed they experince trauma on all levels.

This only leaves the young person expecting nothing will change,no one cares about them,they are not listened to. There experience in foster care and or residential care may offers no positive experiences for them.Resistance by the young person then makes it difficult to engage the young person.

These are based on my experiences,observation and assessments.

]]>